UPDATE - 08 October 2007
The Current Status of the wellfield project Between SW 24th Avenue and SW 28th Avenue.
The meeting was a relatively informal Q & A session beginning with two presentations by representatives from Public Works and from Parks & Recreation. A number of questions regarding noise and visual impact issues were asked by several residents and discussed throughout the session. At the end of the meeting handouts were made available that included a "Frequently Asked Questions" sheet and examples of the type of foliage that could be used to refurbish the damaged areas . (See FAQ & photos below).
Al Santana
Proposed Locations of Wells
Generator Building Elevation
Site Plan for Well 21
Site Plan for Well 22
Sorry
for the delay.
It
was a late night, and I was too tired to type this out when I got home.
Last
night, Nicole Goldstein had represented Waterford Homes in a very effective
address to the City of
We
had about 12 residents (that I know of) that attended last night, and were
effective in showing the Commissioners our sincere concern to the project.
Thanks
for all of you that did show up last night, as Joan and I stayed until the
very end. In fact, I turned out the lights last night.
The
effort that everyone has put forth thus far has proven to be effective. We had
about a 20 minute discussion, and what appeared to be a positive response from
the City.
The
city spoke a bit about how this area was chosen over others. Somehow, we are
the best candidate over other areas considered.
My
guess, from a cost and strategic standpoint of running the pipe line to the
water plant, installing the well pump stations next to our community will cost
the City less money.
The
one fact remains however, the city needs water. The current wells we have are
stressed.
We
may not be able to stop the project, but we can at least be sure that we get
the proper design in place to protect our property investment. And if planned
properly, we could in fact end of with an enhancement to our community
entrance that will ultimately increase your property value.
You
can see the meeting this morning starting at 9 AM on Comcast Channel 78. I
think there is also a replay at 8 or 9 PM tonight was well. I will attempt to
record it and make it available to anyone interested. Just send me an email.
We
are going to have letters delivered to us over the next few days regarding our
first workshop meeting.
It
is set for next Tuesday at 7 PM at the city hall. This meeting is very
important to attend! If you miss this, whatever the outcome is, you will have
no more say in the matter.
This
is your opportunity as a residence of Waterford Homes to speak freely and with
no timer.
Please,
please, please make the time to come.
Please
tell your neighbor about this meeting. Have your neighbor tell their neighbor.
In fact, each and one of you need to talk to at least 3 neighbors.
I
have a new set of plans, and I will try to get them on-line tonight.
There
have been a few changes. One for example is that the well pump station # 21 is
now 35 feet from our property, instead of the prior plan of 42.5 feet. Not
good!
However,
the berm will stay! This is good news.
We
talked a little last night about the city replacing the trees that they pulled
out, now exposing us to more noise, pollution, and less privacy.
These
are just a few of the things that we will need to work out, but I feel
confident that if we have a good turn out, we can get what is well deserved
for our community.
A
beautiful entrance that enriches our property value.
What
to do next?
·
Again,
tell your neighbors to come. (No excuses!)
·
Start
thinking about creative ways to beautify our entrance. The city is all ears
and wants to work with us!
·
Take
pictures of other community borders that you like and feel could be
implemented. (Example: Landscaping, walls etc.)
·
If
you do not want the pumping station installed period, start formulating
questions such as (why was there no public notice sent to us regarding the
plans, or alternative location the city should consider)
·
Ideas
for the park planned in this plot
·
Ideas
for improving the existing parks in our community.
·
Email
this list waterfordhomesemaillistserver@waterfordhomes.org
to communicate your thoughts, concerns now!
·
Call
954-830-0004 if you have any questions, or need transportation to the meeting.
See
you next Tuesday at City Hall. 7 PM
Lu
Vencl
ATTENTION
There
has been some progress made with regards to the concerns of the water pumping
station facility.
I
had a meeting with Commissioner Gonot who has indicated that the berm will
stay.
This
is a major step in the right direction!
Thanks
to all who have taken the steps of contacting the city and our commissioners
about our community concerns.
However,
some of you might have noticed that we now have an increase of noise and less
privacy in our community since the clearing of the several high trees. The
city is urged to replace the removed vegetation with native species trees and
plants to bring once again the much needed privacy and reduce the noise that
is now more noticeable.
It
is highly encourage attending the Commissioners meeting this Tuesday night at
7 PM.
Our
turn out will show the commissioners first hand how we are concerned and
serious about the outcome of the property directly adjacent Waterford Homes.
Nicole
Goldstein, Vice President (current acting President) of Waterford Homeowners
Association has been placed on the docket and will plan to speak the concerns
of the community.
A
workshop is being planned, and is expected to take place on 2/13/07. Look for
an announcement concerning time and place.
It
will be very important for everyone to attend this important meeting.
This
is your chance to be heard and provide suggestions for this project.
We
still have work to do, but it appears we might be headed in the right
direction.
Do
not step aside now, as your input will weigh heavily on the final outcome of
this property.
Lu
Vencl
Resident
of Waterford Homes
PS
I have included tomorrow’s Commissioners meeting agenda below for your
convenience.
AGENDA
Tuesday,
February 6, 2007
7:00
P.M.
CALL
TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Minister
Joseph Cadet, United
APPROVAL
OF THE MINUTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
OF BOARD MINUTES
1)
Community
Redevelopment Agency – January 16, 2007
2)
Board
of Adjustment – December 21, 2006
3)
Code
Enforcement – December 11, 2006
4)
Beautification
Authority – January 22, 2007
5)
Community
Appearance Board – December 6, 2006 and January 10, 2007
6)
Firefighters’
Pension Trust Fund – November 6, 2006
February
6, 2007
PRESENTATIONS
1)
Community Improvement Video
WRITTEN
REQUESTS
1)
Gigi Trejo, Food for the Poor,
2)
Ross Balling, EVP Tour Network, Inc. 117 W. Williams, Michigan City Beach, IN,
requests approval to hold a two (2) day volleyball tournament on the beach on
May 18 and 19, 2007 from 7:00 AM – 9:30 PM.
3)
Ben Kough, 220 NE 8th Terrace,
4)
Louis Kaufman, 2022
5)
Barbara Miranda, 160 Ventnor J, Deerfield Beach, requests to address the
Commission regarding the possibility of holding a Town Hall Meeting on the
Iraqi War.
6)
Caryl Berner, 3130 Cambridge F,
7)
Janyce Becker,
8)
Nicole
Goldstein, 1094 SW 24th Terrace,
CONSENT
AGENDA
1)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida providing a lease with Broward County for certain
property known as the Northeast Focal Point Senior Center Site, for a period
of twenty (20) years, for a cost of $1 per year.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
2)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the Mayor to execute an amended
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants with Broward County for Open Space Site
OS-12, Constitution Park.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
3)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach authorizing the Mayor to execute a Declaration of Restrictive
Covenant with Broward County for Open Space OS-09, Pioneer Park.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
4)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the proper city official to enter into
the First Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement with Broward County for the
acquisition, improvement, enhancement, operation and management of Open Space
OS-09, Pioneer Park.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
CONSENT
AGENDA – CONTINUED
5)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, providing that the obligations set forth within the
Conceptual Park/Resource Management Plan will be included within the City’s
five (5) Year Capital Improvement Program for Site OS-09, Pioneer Park.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
6)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the proper city official to enter into
an agreement with Broward County School Board, for the renewal of school sites
for Deerfield Beach Summer Programs.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
7)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, supporting the US Mayors Climate Protection
Agreement.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
8)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach authorizing the purchase of a 2008 International Chassis from
Sunstate International Trucks, LLC for the Department of Public Works and
Environmental Services, for a total cost not to exceed $72,857.00, and
specifying the funds therefore. Pricing terms are in accordance with the
Florida Sheriff’s Association,
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
9)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the City Manager to file a grant
application for Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council Education and Outreach Small
Grant.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
10)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the proper city officials to purchase
500 roll carts from Toter Incorporated, pursuant to the terms and conditions
of the Houston-Galveston Area Council Cooperative Purchasing Bid GC01-07, for
a total cost not to exceed $25,501.88, and authorizing the purchase of 432
roll carts from Rehrig-Pacific Company, pursuant to the terms and conditions
of the City of Fort Lauderdale Bid 732-8868, for a total cost not to exceed
$25,483.30, and specifying the funds therefore. (Funds
from FY 2006/07 Budget)
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
CONSENT
AGENDA – CONTINUED
11)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the proper city officials to enter into
a subcontract between the University of Miami and the Deerfield Beach Fire
Department for the purpose of engaging in research.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
12)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the proper city officials to award Bid
#2006-07/16 (A. Hanna) for minor home repairs on privately owned homes within
the City of Deerfield Beach, to Crognale and Associates Construction, Inc. in
the amount of $24,155.00, and specifying the funds therefore. (Funding
provided under the State Housing Initiative Housing Partnership (SHIP) Grant
and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG))
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
13)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the proper city officials to award Bid
#2006-07/16 (E. Ester) for minor home repairs on privately owned homes within
the City of Deerfield Beach, to James Joyce Construction in the amount of
$13,150.00, and specifying the funds therefore. (Funding
provided under the State Housing Initiative Housing Partnership (SHIP) Grant)
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
14)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the proper city officials to award Bid
#2006-07/16 (L. Weaver) for minor home repairs on privately owned homes within
the City of Deerfield Beach, to ES Cummings Construction Company in the
amount of $25,420.00, and specifying the funds therefore. (Funding
provided under the State Housing Initiative Housing Partnership (SHIP) Grant
and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG))
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
15)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the proper city officials to award Bid
#2006-07/16 (P. Graley) for minor home repairs on privately owned homes within
the City of Deerfield Beach, to ES Cummings Construction Company in the amount
of $10,560.00, and specifying the funds therefore. (Funding
provided under the State Housing Initiative Housing Partnership (SHIP) Grant)
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
CONSENT
AGENDA – CONTINUED
16)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the proper city officials to award Bid
#2006-07/16 (S. Knowles) for minor home repairs on privately owned homes
within the City of Deerfield Beach, to ES Cummings Construction Company in the
amount of $20,400.00, and specifying the funds therefore. (Funding
provided under the State Housing Initiative Housing Partnership (SHIP) Grant
and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG))
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
17)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the proper city officials to award Bid
#2006-07/16 (S. Sherk) for minor home repairs on privately owned homes within
the City of Deerfield Beach, to James Joyce Construction Company in the amount
of $19,510.00, and specifying the funds therefore. (Funding
provided under the State Housing Initiative Housing Partnership (SHIP) Grant
and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG))
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
18)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the proper city officials to award Bid
#2006-07/16 (M. Smith) for minor home repairs on privately owned homes within
the City of Deerfield Beach, to Joines Construction and Development, LLC in
the amount of $24,722.50, and specifying the funds therefore. (Funding
provided under the State Housing Initiative Housing Partnership (SHIP) Grant
and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG))
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
19)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, authorizing the proper city officials to award Bid
#2006-07/16 (B. Cross) for minor home repairs on privately owned homes within
the City of Deerfield Beach, to Joines Construction and Development, LLC in
the amount of $26,491.00, and specifying the funds therefore. (Funding
provided under the State Housing Initiative Housing Partnership (SHIP) Grant
and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG))
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
20)
Ordinance 2007/ - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DEERFIELD
BEACH, AMENDING SECTION 102-8(f)(2) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATIVE TO
BENCH SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CITY CODE; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
ACTION: Commission to vote on Ordinance and set public hearing for
February 20, 2006.
CONSENT
AGENDA – CONTINUED
21)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, urging members of the Florida Legislature to support
various municipal issues during the 2007 Legislative Session.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
22)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, approving a second addendum to the agreement with
Sun Recycling, LLC and Amendment to Lease with Sun Recycling, LLC.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
23)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, approving a renewal of the Microsoft License
Agreement.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
24)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City of Deerfield Beach, Florida,
electing to use the Uniform Method of Collecting Non-Ad Valorem Special
Assessments levied within the incorporated area of the City; stating a need
for such levy; providing for the mailing of this Resolution; and providing for
an effective date.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
25)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, awarding a bid to Ferguson Waterworks and Supply Waterworks
for the purchase of backflow preventers and pressure vacuum breakers for the
Utilities Maintenance Division, for a total cost not to exceed $60,000.00 and
$10,000.00 respectively, and specifying the funds therefore. (Funds
from budgeted account #401-5030-536.60-31)
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
26)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, authorizing the purchase of one (1) Altec Model TA 40,
mounted on a 2008 Ford F550 Chassis, from Duval Ford for the Department of
Public Works & Environmental Services – Utilities Maintenance Division,
for a total cost not to exceed $93,345.00, and specifying the funds therefore.
(Funds
from Fiscal Year 2006/07 Budget)
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
CONSENT
AGENDA – CONTINUED
27)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach approving a change order with Crognale & Associates, for
repairs of a private home, for a total cost not to exceed $7,942.00
(Funds from State Housing Initiative Housing Partnership (SHIP) Grant and
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG))
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
28)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach amending Resolution No. 2007/011, to remove the purchase from
Burhard’s Tractor and Equipment for a John Deere 5225 tractor for the
Department of Parks & Recreation – Grounds Maintenance and substitute
the purchase for a John Deere 5225 tractor from John Deere, for a total cost
not to exceed $24,767.16, and specifying the funds therefore.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
29)
Ordinance 2007/ - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DEERFIELD
BEACH, FLORIDA, VACATING AND ABANDONING A 12-FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT
DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF PARCELS “A” AND “B”, PICCADILLY
CAFETERIA-DEERFIELD PLAT; DETERMINING THE NECESSITY THEREFORE; AND DIRECTING
THAT A COPY HEREOF BE FILED WITH THE PROPERTY APPRAISER’S AND COUNTY
RECORDER’S OFFICES IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Ordinance and set public hearing for February 20, 2006.
PUBLIC
HEARINGS – 2ND
30)
PH 2007-066: Ordinance 2007/ - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DEERFIELD BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 617, SECTION 7(A), 7(D)
AND 7(E), RELATING TO THE HIRING AND FIRING OF THE POLICE CHIEF AND FIRE
CHIEF; PROVIDING FOR HIRING AND FIRING OF THE POLICE CHIEF AND FIRE CHIEF BY
THE CITY MANAGER; ALSO REPEALING SECTION 12(G) AND AMENDING SECTION 11(A) OF
ORDINANCE NO. 617 WITH REGARD TO TERMINATING THE FIRE CHIEF OR POLICE CHIEF;
CONTAINING A PROVISION FOR INCLUSION IN THE CITY CODE; CONTAINING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; CONTAINING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Ordinance
PUBLIC
HEARINGS – 2ND
31)
PH 2007-067: Ordinance 2007/ - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DEERFIELD BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 58-38 OF THE CITY CODE TO
INCREASE CERTAIN RATES OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR
INCLUSION IN THE CITY CODE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE (Commercial
Accounts)
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Ordinance
QUASI-JUDICIAL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
32)
PH 2007-070: APPLICATION 06-P-181
Applicant:
PAUL AND
Proposal:
To plat a 3.29-acre parcel to be known as the PAUL AND NANCY PLAT.
Location:
The property is described as land lying in Section 35, Township 47 South,
Range 42 East together with all of Parcel A of the WELCH plat, more
particularly described in the file, located at
ACTION: Motion on decision of Commission
33)
PH 2007-071: APPLICATION 05-RM25-78 – SITE PLAN EXTENSION
Applicant:
MILLION ONE, by Pedro Gomez
Proposal:
To demolish an existing 11-unit motel and construct 9 multi-family dwelling
units totaling 11,197 square feet.
Location:
Lots 8 and 9, Block 33, of the DEERFIELD BEACH PLAT, located at
ACTION: Motion on decision of Commission
34)
PH 2007-072: APPLICATION 84-B3-18
REVISION 2 AND CASE NO. 2104
Applicant:
DOUBLE
EAGLE DISTRIBUTING, INC., by James Smith
Proposal:
To
modify an existing site plan to construct a 41,313 square foot warehouse
addition, totaling 108,908 square feet; AND
seeking a TECHNICAL DEVIATION for 35 parking spaces in accordance with Section
98-88(q) of the Deerfield Beach Land Development Code.
Location:
A
6.14-acre parcel, described as a portion of the North ½ of Government Lots 1
and 2, and a portion of the Northeast ¼, both of Section 2, Township 48
South, Range 42 East and a portion of Parcel “D” SEABOARD SYSTEM RAILROAD
PLAT, more
particularly described in the file, located at 50 Lock Road.
ACTION: Motion on decision of Commission
QUASI-JUDICIAL
PUBLIC HEARINGS – CONTINUED
35)
PH 2007-073: APPLICATION 84-B1-41 REVISION 1 AND CASE NO. 2099
Applicant:
AMERICAN LEGION, by Mike McGeachy
Proposal:
To modify an existing site plan in order to add an elevator to an existing
building; AND seeking the following 4
VARIANCES from the provisions of Section 98-61 of the Deerfield
Beach Land Development Code: 1.)
to allow a front setback of 1.6 feet rather than the required 10 feet; 2.)
to allow a lot coverage of 73% (2,656 sq. ft.) rather than the maximum of 50%
(1,760 sq. ft.); 3.) to allow a
floor area ratio of 1.41 (4,967 sq. ft.) rather than the maximum 1.0 (3,520
sq. ft.); AND 4.) to allow a
minimum landscape area of 14% (495 sq. ft.) rather than the minimum of 15%
(528 sq. ft.)
Location:
Lots 18 and 19,
ACTION: Motion on decision of Commission
36)
PH 2007-074: APPLICATION 06-RM13c-1
Applicant:
HIGHLAND GARDENS DEVELOPMENT, LTD., by Keith & Associates, Inc.
Proposal:
To modify an existing site plan for a special residential facility to
construct an additional 135 sleeping rooms (68 dwelling unit equivalents) for
a total of 235 sleeping rooms (118 dwelling unit equivalents).
Location:
A 7.54-acre parcel described as a portion of Tract A, HIGHLAND GARDENS
CONDOMINIUM, more particularly described in the file, located at
ACTION:
Motion on decision of Commission
37)
PH 2007-075: APPLICATION 06-B1-181 REVISION 1 AND CASE NO. 2105
Applicant:
TARGET CORPORATION by Kimley-Horn & Associates
Proposal:
To modify an existing site plan to increase the size of the previously
approved Super Target building by 16,073 square feet (for a total of 189,733
square feet), add a garden center, relocate the loading area, reduce the size
of the previously approved other retail buildings by 14,000 square feet, and
modify the parking and landscaping accordingly; AND seeking a VARIANCE from
the provisions of Section 98-53 of the Deerfield Beach Land Development Code
in order to allow the outdoor sales and display of garden material not within
a fully enclosed building. (While the proposed garden center is defined
by fencing and walls it is not fully enclosed as required by Code.)
Location:
A portion of PARCEL A, the LAST PLAT OF DEER CREEK, together with a portion of
Parcel A, BUTLER’ S CORNER, more particularly described in the file, located
at 3597 W. Hillsboro Boulevard.
ACTION:
Motion on decision of Commission
GENERAL
ITEMS
38)
Discussion regarding the communication
tower being constructed at the Villages of
ACTION:
Motion on decision of Commission
39)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, setting forth a list of eligible projects for the
proposed $25,000,000.00 Fire and Emergency Rescue General Obligation Bond.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
40)
Resolution 2007/ - A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of
Deerfield Beach, Florida, setting forth a list of eligible projects for the
proposed $30,000,000.00 Parks and Recreation Open Space General Obligation
Bond.
ACTION:
Commission to vote on Resolution
41)
Discussion regarding lake erosion at
ACTION:
Motion on decision of Commission
ADMINISTRATIVE
ACTIONS AND CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
COMMENTS
BY MAYOR AND COMMISSIONERS
PUBLIC
TO BE HEARD
Persons
addressing the Commission during this segment may not discuss items that are
on the agenda. A three (3) minute time limit will be
imposed on those addressing the Commission. The Commission
shall take the subject under advisement and refer to administration unless a
majority of the Commission wishes to discuss the matter.
FUTURE
MEETINGS
Regular
Meeting – February 20, 2007
Regular
Meeting – March 6, 2007
Written
requests to address the Commission must be submitted to City Manager one week
prior to commission meeting. Any person wishing to appeal any decision
made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at such
meetings or hearings will need a record of the proceedings, and for such
purposes may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and the evidence upon which the appeal is
made. The above notice is required by State Law (F.S. 286.0105). Anyone
desiring a verbatim transcript shall have the responsibility, at his/her own
expense, to arrange for the presence of a certified court reporter at the
hearing.
Last
night the community of Waterford Homes came together on a conference call. The
number of people attending on last night’s call proved that you as residents
are concerned about the community, your investment, and the well being of the
people living here.
The
call went on for about 45 minutes. There was a good amount of information and
questions raised by the concerned.
If
you missed the call or forgot about it, don’t worry. We will have another
one soon.
The
board will be attempting to arrange a meeting with the City planning and
Zoning in the next few days. As soon as a definitive date is arranged, an
email will be posted.
And
also at the end of this email, Nicole found some discussion from a Commission
workshop held on Thursday, June
29, 2006 at 7:15 PM
If
you receive any information, or have questions, please email the board members
by sending to board@waterfordhomes.org
You
may also call 954-830-0004.
Perhaps
placing this well in another area further away from homes would be the safest
approach.
Sinkholes
Sinkholes
are common where the rock below the land surface is limestone, carbonate rock,
salt beds, or rocks that can naturally be dissolved by ground water
circulating through them. As the rock dissolves, spaces and caverns develop
underground. Sinkholes are dramatic because the land usually stays intact for
a while until the underground spaces just get too big. If there is not enough
support for the land above the spaces then a sudden collapse of the land
surface can occur. These collapses can be small, as this picture shows, or
they can be huge and can occur where a house or road is on top.
The
most damage from sinkholes tends to occur in
Areas
prone to collapse sinkholes
The
map below shows areas of the
Sinkholes
can be human-induced
New
sinkholes have been correlated to land-use practices, especially
from ground-water pumping
and from construction and development practices. Sinkholes can also form when
natural water-drainage patterns are changed and new water-diversion systems
are developed. Some sinkholes form when the land surface is changed, such as
when industrial and runoff-storage ponds are created. The substantial weight
of the new material can trigger an underground collapse of supporting
material, thus causing a sinkhole.
The
overburden sediments that cover buried cavities in the aquifer systems are
delicately balanced by ground-water fluid pressure. The water below ground is
actually helping to keep the surface soil in place. Ground-water
pumping for urban water supply and for irrigation can produce new sinkholes.
Commission
Minutes - Workshops - 06/29/2006 Commission Workshop Minutes
CITY
OF
CITY
COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES
Thursday,
June 29, 2006 at 7:15 PM
PRESENT:
Commissioner Steve Gonot
Commissioner
Sylvia Poitier
Commissioner
Martin Popelsky
Vice
Mayor Pam Militello
Mayor
Capellini - absent
Samantha
Gillyard,
ITEM
1
TAPE 1, COUNT 002
DISCUSSION
REGARDING THE WATER TREATMENT PROJECT
Carl
Peter, Director of Public Works and Environmental Services, stated that there
have been several recent changes in the Federal Law impacting water quality.
The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) is also changing their
requirements and limitations. This change includes the Governor’s decision
to lower Lake Okeechobee, due to the dike conditions effect to the water
supply in
Mr.
Miller stated that due to the continued expansion and construction at the
treatment plants, the City has not competed against other systems; if under
construction, competing is not allowed. He stated that the City’s
water quality is the best around and stood out during the last hurricane.
While others suffered, the PWES team worked hard to maintain water service.
Mr.
Miller referenced the PowerPoint presentation created by the PWES department.
He stated that under the Clean Water Act, the Federal Government continues to
enforce strict regulations relating to the City’s source water.
Adhering to these regulations has made it very difficult to treat the water;
therefore, continually advancing technology is required.
Secondly,
due to the growing population and the SFMWD’s restoration of the
Mr.
Miller stated that other options include installing a new well field, building
an additional plant, and remodeling the east plant, as it is no longer
effective as a treatment facility; these factors are driving the costs.
Continuing,
Mr. Miller stated the SFWMD controls the water used by the City. In
2004, the City renewed the water permit. Since the City is growing, the
SFWMD allocated an increase over the previous permit. Also, the
Everglades Restoration Act was passed and new parameters were implemented,
realizing that only a certain amount of water would be limited to each
municipality from the regional system;
In
response to Vice Mayor Militello’s question, Mr. Miller replied that the
SFWMD would take the water back in September 2007.
Commissioner
Popelsky asked if the additional source meant drilling additional wells.
Mr.
Miller stated that drilling wells would be feasible, as existing treatment
could still be utilized. Unfortunately, the City cannot pull additional
water from the Biscayne Aquifer; for the entire district, it is referred to as
the Surficical Aquifer, which is between 20 - 150 feet below.
Additionally, he stated that the Floridan Aquifer is at a further depth and is
brackish water, which requires different treatment. He stated that this
water might be utilized to offset the allocation, along with any needed for
the future.
Commissioner
Popelsky asked if Mr. Miller has a system that he can treat the brackish water
for use.
Mr.
Miller replied that that is another issue. When the changes are made,
there will be three (3) different types of treatment processes at the West
Water Treatment Plant. Each process will undergo various treatments,
pressures and chemicals, and will go into a common blending well. This
blending well is also where the operatives treat the water for public
consumption.
In
response to Commissioner Poitier’s question, Mr. Miller replied that there
are two (2) existing well fields, one (1) is the original well field, which
was installed over a period of time throughout the 60's and 70's, which is
along 2nd Avenue, one (1) block east of Martin Luther King, Jr.
Boulevard.
Continuing,
Mr. Miller stated that because
Mr.
Miller stated that the second well field was built in the late 70's, early
80's, and runs along railway corridor between Goolsby up to
Additionally,
Mr. Miller stated that he is involved in the Regional Regulatory departments,
such as SFWMD, as they control the water. He stated if not involved, the
City is vulnerable to their decisions.
Commissioner
Poitier asked if water could be used from canals.
Mr.
Miller replied no. However, the District states that it is important to
take advantage of wastewater by product, by returning it to the canal system.
The County is trying to establish a policy in
Commissioner
Popelsky asked what population the projections are based on.
Mr.
Miller replied that Planning and Growth Management supplied the figures
however, there are two (2) figures that the City must focus on. There is
a comprehensive plan that deals with the total population. For water,
Public Works only deals with people physically connected to the City; thus, a
population figure of 52,000 is fairly stable.
Commissioner
Popelsky asked if the County is still servicing the individuals in the annexed
area.
Mr.
Miller replied yes.
Commissioner
Gonot stated that those residents would probably remain with the County for a
while.
Commissioner
Popelsky stated that since the City is considering additional wells, there
must be consideration for growth.
Mr.
Miller stated that everything that is being set up is based on 20 to 25 years
from now.
Commissioner
Poitier stated that she has never seen a City annex an area and the area be
serviced by the County.
Mr.
Miller stated that the only way to service the annexed residents would be to
acquire system 2, on
In
response to Vice Mayor Militello’s question, Mr. Miller stated that he is
unsure whether the City would have to take over the service of annexed
residents.
Mr.
Miller stated that there has been discussion of the County overtaking the
smaller cities; however, he does think that will be possible, since the County
receives revenue from providing raw water.
Commissioner
Poitier stated that the water from Stanley Terrace smells like untreated well
water.
Mr.
Miller stated that there could be several reasons for this. He stated
that the volume of water being utilized is less than what was anticipated.
If enough water does not run through the lines, there could be settling of
calcium carbonate or lime softening in the old systems. Lime softening
is a thin crust, brownish in color that forms around the pipes. When the
lines are flushed, everything is agitated and the water might be brown or have
an odor. He also provided other reasons for the water to be in this
condition.
In
response to Commissioner Poitier’s question, Mr. Miller stated that he would
have personnel go to Stanley Terrace and test the water going to the building.
If the water to the building is fine, then it is an internal problem. If
the water to the building has a problem, then that is a distribution issue
which the City must address.
Continuing,
Mr. Miller referred to the PowerPoint presentation. He stated that most
of the requirements being proposed is tied to limiting the water the City has
available for recharge. If the City experienced a drought, when pulling
water out of the ground, the wells recharge slower and the amount of volume
becomes less, which could lead to damaging the well. The SFWMD will
release more water to fill up secondary canals and other canals, which helps
recharge the well fields. Unfortunately, that will not be available;
thus, an alternative water supply is needed. The additional aquifer that
the City is seeking would not be impacted by those conditions.
Vice
Mayor Militello asked what time frame would be needed to complete this.
Mr.
Miller replied that the City is approximately 99% complete on the design and
have hopes of beginning the bid on the RO process next month. The well
fields will be complete maybe January 2007.
Commissioner
Poitier asked if this plant was a budgeted item.
Commissioner
Popelsky asked if the funds that are allocated in the budget are based on the
upcoming years.
Mr.
Peter stated that it is shown in the capital improvement plan each year, but
then allocated as required.
Additionally,
Mr. Peter stated that in the capital improvement plan, it shows that the City
is expected to receive funding through a State Revolving Fund or Enterprise
Fund.
Mr.
Miller stated that these projects have been in the Capital Improvement Plan
for a while and some were shown last year. It illustrates that by a
certain year, the City will have to find funding for the project.
Commissioner
Popelsky made reference to various sources that could fund the plant and
wells. He stated that the plant might cost $10 million.
Mr.
Miller replied that the plant is priced at $9 million. The well field is
approximately $2 million. He stated that this is a $12 million bond
issue that will have to be funded.
Referring
to the PowerPoint presentation
Mr.
Miller stated that the City is running close to its permitted uses, in terms
of demand versus production. Even if none of the issues surfaced, the
City would have to find additional water. Since the only place the water
can be obtained is the Floridan aquifer, a plant must be built to treat that
type of water, as it is very brackish.
Commissioner
Popelsky asked if Mr. Miller had any location for the plant.
Mr.
Miller replied that it would be located south of the current membrane
building, where there is a retention area that would have to be moved.
He stated that although it is a tight fit, it would be sufficient. Right
now, the City is allotted 12.6 to pull from the ground and currently averages
12.1. By 2007, the District will reduce the City to 12.2; nonetheless,
the City’s projections do not increase much, but because of the reduction,
we are exceeding what is allowed to pull from the ground.
Continuing,
Mr. Miller stated that the City of
Vice
Mayor Militello stated that there should be conservation efforts in place,
with. regard to sprinkling
Mr.
Miller stated that there has been a 5% reduction in City sprinkling.
Vice
Mayor Militello stated that the City should be proactive in helping the
environment and conserve water.
Commissioner
Popelsky asked if homeowner associations and golf courses use lake water.
Mr.
Peter stated that they draw from canals now.
Commissioner
Popelsky asked if there are any codes that address water conservation when
something new is being built.
Gerald
Ferguson, Director of Planning and Growth Management, replied that he is not
aware of anything that addresses water conservation.
Discussion
pursued regarding water conservation for homeowner associations and golf
courses.
Vice
Mayor Militello stated that a water conservation method should be implemented
now and people will not find it a burden to water their lawn after 7 PM.
Mr.
Peter stated that there is an Ordinance in place for drought conditions, but
should be revised so that it is year round.
Referring
to the PowerPoint presentation
Mr.
Miller referenced the slide named Historical Biscayne Well Demand, which
illustrates the average withdrawal based on current permit and the average
withdrawal based on the new permit. He stated that at least six (6)
months out of the year, the City is close to or exceeding what is allowed.
Regional
Water Supply Issues
– Mr. Miller stated that the SFWMD would lower the level that the lakes are
kept at, which means there is less water to be sent out during a drought
condition.
Continuing,
he stated that the governing board adapted policies last month to control the
water, and urged cities to drought protect themselves.
City
Water Facilities Planned Improvements –
Mr. Miller stated that the planned improvements will take place at the West
site. The deep well was approved at the last Commission Meeting; the RO
Plant will be addressed around August.
Proposed
Well Field Improvements
– Mr. Miller stated that the new well field will come later and it is a
mixed well field. There will be two (2) Biscayne wells being utilized
because the four (4) existing wells have been used for over 30 years and are
almost obsolete. Additionally, much money is spent in maintaining them.
He stated that by installing two (2) additional wells, the wells can be
rehabilitated and regain the capacity that they originally had.
Commissioner
Popelsky asked if there is a return on selling bottled water.
Mr.
Peter stated that it does not add up and is mostly for public relations.
Mr.
Miller stated that Publix’s bottled water comes from the City. He
stated that they polish it to their specifications and they moved to
Construction
Cost Escalation –
Mr. Miller stated that the cost of construction has increased over the past
years.
Larry
Adams, Camper Dresser & McKee, stated that the predicted costs are
premised on construction costs escalating.
Forecasted
Five-Year Capital Expenditures
– Mr. Adams stated that essentially, these are the estimates of the projects
that have been identified, to include, but not limited to: Membrane
Concentrate Pump Station; Deep Injection Well; West WTP Expansion, etc.
Additionally,
he stated that the State Revolving Loan Program would finance the Membrane
Concentrate Pump Station and the Deep Injection Well.
Further,
he stated that an anticipated revenue bond would take care of the West WTP
Expansion, the well field, the well water main, the Floridan Well, the
re-pump, and the wastewater sewer improvements. He stated that a revenue
bond and connection fees would handle essentially 80% of the projects.
Continuing,
Mr. Adams stated that there are miscellaneous capital projects that will be
funded from the net revenues of the water and sewer rates.
Projected
Rate Increases Needed through 2010
– Mr. Adams stated that there is a need for a water and sewer rate increase
of 7% beginning in Fiscal Year 2007. He stated that a single-family
homeowner who uses 7,000 gallons per month would increase from $45.12 to
$48.28 per month. An additional rate increase is forecasted for 2008,
which is identified as a 7% overall increase to water and sewer rates.
By the end of 2008, it will be a charge of $51.66 for 7,000 gallons.
Comparison
of Water & Sewer Rates
– Mr. Adams referenced the table, provided by
Commissioner
Gonot asked what would the impact of increasing rates at 3% incrementally be.
Mr.
Adams stated that they have a rate model and can experiment with the figures.
Further, he stated that there would be a 15% rate increase overall, but there
are options as to how it is achieved.
Continuing,
Mr. Adams stated that the City has a rate stabilization fund that is in force
and the projections show the fund being depleted in 2008, but can review the
model and see where the shortfalls may be.
Additionally,
Mr. Adams stated that
Mr.
Miller stated that now is the time to address the situation, with respect to a
varying rate plan.
In
response to Commissioner Poitier’s question, Mr. Adams replied that the rate
is based on volume charges (inverted block rate). After 6,000 gallons,
the charge increases.
Dennis
Girisgen, City Engineer, stated that the charges go from $1.70 to $1.90, then
$2.21 after 12,000 gallons.
Commissioner
Popelsky asked if the charges would be kept similar to the industry.
Mr.
Adams replied that if the 7% increase is placed in volume charges, then the
volume charges would increase approximately 12% and the base facility charge
would remain the same. Additionally, he stated that the current rate
structure incurs during conservation, because the larger users pay more per
1,000 gallons.
In
response to Commissioner Popelsky’s question, Mr. Adams replied that the
rate volume for condominiums are similar to single family homes, but the base
rate is lower, as the average demand is lower than a single family
residential.
Mr.
Adams stated that the City would needs to move forward with the bond issue.
Since these projects have not been out for bid, the City needs to find a way
to protect itself in this environment, due to the increased construction
costs.
Vice
Mayor Militello stated that the infrastructure needs to be taken care of and
asked Mr. Adams exactly what is needed, without shaving the cost now and then
requesting additional funds later on. She said that this would hurt the
City in the long run.
Mr.
Adams stated that there could be a possibility of grant money being available
for part of the project from the SFWMD, which will be pursued. If this
works out, it will reduce the cost for the City.
Commissioner
Gonot stated that he does not mind smoothing the increases along over five (5)
years and paying on the high side, and hopefully, all the increases are not
needed. Additionally, he stated that if the cost of service were running
under the rate of inflation, people would be better able to accept the
increase versus a 7% increase.
Commissioner
Popelsky suggested estimating the building costs during the years that the
projects will be constructed, so that true value is established.
In
response to Commissioner Poitier’s question, Mr. Miller stated that the City
has grant writers, but he has been working with the District. When it is
time to write the grant, he will use the assistance of the Grant Writer.
Further, he stated that this is the first time the District has offered
grants, as they realize their policies cause cities to face a financial
impact.
Mr.
Adams stated that CDM would assist the City in pursuing a grant.
Commissioner
Poitier stated that once this avenue is encroached upon, the City would know
how much is needed for a revenue bond.
Vice
Mayor Militello asked how much the City could possibly receive through the
grant.
Mr.
Miller replied that the grant would give 40% of the project, up to $1 million.
Mr.
Adams stated that the City can ask the legislature for special consideration,
which CDM will assist with as well.
Vice
Mayor Militello asked if there are grants for cities trying to implement
conservation laws.
Mr.
Adams stated that a grant was provided in the amount of $25,000, which was
related to recycling the nanofiltration concentrate.
Commissioner
Poitier asked what actions will be taken between now and September 30, 2006.
Mr.
Wayne stated that he would finish the design with the consulting engineers on
the plant, and then place for bid. Once the figures are received, the
Commission will be informed.
ADJOURNMENT:
There
being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:30 PM.
ALBERT
R. CAPELLINI, P.E., MAYOR
ATTEST:
SAMANTHA
GILLYARD, ACTING CITY CLERK